A group of thirty mothers had taken refuge in a childbirth facility in El Fasher, Sudan, as the slaughter began. Some had just delivered their newborns, while others were in the midst of labor.
Working that night, a 28-year-old lab technician, a technician named Abdo-Rabo Ahmed, became one of the few known survivors. âThere were cries of women and children,â he recounts. âA massacre was taking place inside the hospital. Those who could run, fled.â
This horrifying event stands as a particularly egregious examples in the protracted internal conflict tearing the African nation apart. Armed soldiers forced their way into the building, leaving dead more than 460 individuals receiving care and their families.
Rights organizations have described it as âan act of unspeakable brutality,â and a stark illustration of the collapse in safety for civilians living amidst warfare in multiple global hotspots.
While all major powers have signed the international laws of war, which commit them to defending civilians, the past year has witnessed an unprecedented spike of violence targeting health services. Women undergoing childbirth are exceptionally vulnerable due to their reliance on locally available medical care.
An investigation of records uncover an shocking trend: nearly 300 incidents targeting or hindering places and people associated with childbirth over the last three years, including at least 119 targeted attacks against hospitals and delivery wards.
âThese are not standard wartime hazards. They form a systematic assault on childbirth.â
The majority of these attacks have taken place in regions embroiled in intense conflict, where hundreds of thousands of pregnant women are trapped.
Deaths have occurred, prevented from accessing care, or compelled to deliver in perilous and unsafe environments. The data also indicates that at least 68 childbirth professionals and specialists have been murdered, 15 kidnapped, and 101 arrestedâsometimes during medical procedures.
The numbers are probably a substantial underreporting, as they only include incidents documented publicly. In many war-torn areas, communications are sparse.
Last year, it was reported that half of all women who lost their lives in maternal circumstances resided in a war zone. This underscores a catastrophic reality.
In addition to the loss of life, these attacks are obliterating hospitals and wards, posing a long-term threat to societal repopulation and recovery.
In Gaza, the ruinous consequences on reproductive health rights has been cited by a UN commission as one reason behind genocide allegations.
Following truces, doctors report that women and children are still perishing from a lack of proper treatment, owing to severe deficits of medicine and equipment. UN officials have relayed women delivering babies amidst ruins because hospitals were inaccessible.
âWeâve had rockets hitting the wards, operating rooms, and maternity wards,â explains the head of a major hospitalâs gynecology department. A military spokesperson has denied deliberately targeting maternity care or seeking to affect birthrates.
Since early 2022, at least 80 maternity and neonatal facilities have been damaged or destroyed in Ukraine. Reports from frontline hospitals describe births occurring in shelters and skyrocketing stress leading to birth complications.
âRussia is targeting us deliberately,â says the head of obstetrics at a repeatedly damaged hospital in Kherson. Russian authorities have denied deliberately targeting civilians.
âIn fact, every facility faces the threat of assault,â comments a medical director in Sumy. âIf a drone is destroyed, the falling debris may hit a hospital.â
For the over half a billion females living within range of fighting, there are scarce guarantees and rare trials for atrocities for those assaulting reproductive health.
This void of justice has led to a âatmosphere of lawlessness,â explains a human rights lawyer. âViolence targeting childbirth, like forced pregnancy or forced sterilisation, can be understood as acts of genocide by preventing births.â
In El Fasher, the area was isolated from humanitarian aid long before the hospital attack, with malnutrition rising sharply, especially among children and pregnant women.
In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, information is restricted due to a inability to report from rebel-held areas. Nevertheless, shelling in Goma hit a neonatal ward, causing fatalities among patients and staff.
In Myanmar, hospitals have come under fire and dozens of midwives and patients have been arrested, killed, or injured over the past two years of civil war.
A large proportion of mother deaths are preventable with routine care, but war collapses medical infrastructure. Rights groups note that terror is compelling women away from facilities once considered safe, pushing them toward risky home births lacking professional help.
âIf maternity hospitals are being deliberately targeted indicates a wider and more disturbing trend: the use of attacks on medical facilities as a tool for terror and to destroy community bonds,â says a legal researcher.
âThere is no absolute protection for hospitals in war. Under the Geneva conventions, medical facilities can lose their protected status if used for acts deemed âmilitarily advantageousâ, which has now become a standard defence.â
A tech journalist with over a decade of experience covering emerging technologies and consumer electronics.